A Bad Law
So it is with the current Illinois legislature. As I write, there is on the Governor's desk a stealth bill to do just that. It would seem to me that any radical change in how the U.S. Constitution is manifest, should be by the amendment process outlined in the Constitution. That should certainly be the case if a law usurps enumerated Constitutional powers of Congress. Such is the case with HB 1685. The original short description of the bill 'ELEC CD-JUNIOR JUDGES', a bill to essentially allow high school students with an adequate grade point to serve as election judges, provided they met certain other criteria. That sounds good to me. The election boards have difficulty in filling all of the judge spots and it introduces young people to the election process. However, the bill was stripped of all of the provisions in the bill and amended to a bill that 'Creates the Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote Act.' People may not like the Electoral College provision in the Constitution, but it is the law of the land. If we as a people want to change it, there should be open public discussion of the pros and cons of the issue and then it should be amended as provided for in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. To do so behind the scenes in the formerly smoke filled rooms of the Illinois Legislature is flat out wrong!
As Abraham Lincoln put it: "I do not mean to say we are bound to follow implicitly in whatever our fathers did. To do so would be to discard all the lights of current experience-- to reject all progress, all improvement. What I do say, is, that if we would supplant the opinions and policy of our fathers in any case, we should do so on evidence so conclusive and argument so clear, that even their great authority, fairly considered and weighed, cannot stand." That is not happening in Springfield.
To mention a few of the problems:
- It changes the commonly understood function of U.S. Constitution without going through the prescribed methods.
- It amends the Constitution by fiat of as few as 11 states; a method contrary to the expressed and commonly understood 2/3 super majority of states to call for a change in the Constitution. (Though this Right has not been undertaken by any group of States since the Constitution was enacted.)
- It usurps the enumerated powers of the U.S. Congress' role in the election of the President of the United States.
- It would cause the Illinois electors to vote for the top vote getter even if that candidate espoused positions that would be detrimental to Illinois.
- It causes Illinois electors to to vote for the person that received the most votes nationally even if every Citizen in Illinois voted for someone else!
- It could very well send every election into the Courts, because every vote included or not included could change the election.
- In the event of 3 or 4 strong candidates, the President could be elected with as few as 25% of the vote.
I could go on, but then I might never post this blog. It is a shame that the Press is not covering this issue, but for a dismissive comment by Eric Zorn.
Labels: national popular vote, political